RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the markers of tubular phosphate handling in adults with sickle cell anemia (SCA) and the influence of hydroxyurea (HU), the degree of anemia and Hb F concentration on these markers. METHODS: Eighty-eight steady state SCA patients in outpatient follow-up in Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil and 31 healthy individuals were included in this study. Vitamin D (25OHD) was measured by enzyme-bound fluorescence assay, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) by electrochemiluminescence, and serum and urinary phosphate and creatinine by colorimetric methods. Details of Hb F and HU use were obtained from clinical records. Tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TRP) and maximum tubular reabsorption of phosphate (MTRP) were calculated. SCA patients were stratified according to the use of HU, degree of anemia and percentage of Hb F. The significance level was set for p-values <0.05. RESULTS: Compared to controls the 25OHD level (25 ± 11 vs. 30 ± 9 pg/mL) was lower in SCA, while serum phosphate and MTRP were higher (3.86 ± 0.94 vs. 3.46 ± 0.72 and 3.6 ± 1.21 vs. 3.21 ± 0.53, respectively). There was no significant difference in iPTH, TRP and phosphaturia. Serum phosphate showed correlation with TRP (r = 0.32; p-value = 0.008) and MTRP (r = 0.9; p-value <0.001) in SCA. Patients taking HU, especially those with Hb F >10 % presented reduced serum phosphate levels, and TRP and MTRP rates. Those with mild anemia presented reduced serum phosphate levels and MTRP rates. CONCLUSION: Serum phosphate levels and renal phosphate reabsorption rate were increased in SCA. HU use, high Hb F concentration and total Hb were associated with better control of tubular phosphate handling markers.
RESUMO
Objetivo: Avaliar o perfil clínico-terapêutico e a resposta à profilaxia em pacientes hemofílicos A e B em um centro de referência no Ceará. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo, com dados de 133 hemofílicos A e B, em profilaxia entre 2016 e 2021, por meio de prontuários médicos e sistema Web Coagulopatias. Resultados: Os pacientes todos do sexo masculino em sua maioria foram hemofílicos A (93,2%), na forma grave, residentes em Fortaleza, com maior prevalência do município de Guaiúba. A maioria fazia uso de Fator VIII recombinante e em profilaxia secundária, em relação ao comprometimento articular a maioria não apresentou relato de hemartroses (66,9%), articulação-alvo (87,9%) ou artropatia (54,9%), porém os hemofílicos em profilaxia terciária apresentaram um maior comprometimento articular em relação a profilaxia primária e secundária. Verificou-se uma correlação negativa entre o tempo de profilaxia e a dose de fator utilizada, demonstrando que quanto maior o tempo de profilaxia menor a dose do fator utilizada. Um total de 13 hemofílicos A grave desenvolveram inibidor de fator VIII realizando imunotolerância (ITI) com sucesso total em 84,6%. Por meio da curva ROC, foi verificado uma associação entre a necessidade de ITI e a dose de fator de coagulação, com acurácia de 67,7% de que o uso de doses maiores de fator predispõe ao desenvolvimento de inibidores. Conclusão: Os dados do estudo permitem inferir que quanto mais precoce o tratamento de profilaxia menor é comprometimento articular, dose do fator utilizada e menor predisposição de desenvolver inibidores dos fatores da coagulação.
Objective: to evaluate the clinical-therapeutic profile and response to prophylaxis in hemophiliac A and B patients at a referral center in Ceará. Methods: Retrospective cohort study, with data from 133 hemophiliacs A and B, undergoing prophylaxis between 2016 and 2021, using medical records and the Web Coagulopathies system. Results: Most of the patients were male patients with severe hemophilia A (93.2%), residing in Fortaleza, with a higher prevalence in the city of Guaiúba. Most made use of recombinant Factor VIII and in secondary prophylaxis, in relation to joint involvement, the majority did not report hemarthroses (66.9%), target joint (87.9%) or arthropathy (54.9%). however, hemophiliacs on tertiary prophylaxis showed greater joint impairment in relation to primary and secondary prophylaxis. There was a negative correlation between the prophylaxis time and the factor dose used, demonstrating that the longer the prophylaxis time, the lower the factor dose used. A total of 13 severe A hemophiliacs developed factor VIII inhibitor performing immunotolerance (ITI) with total success in 84.6%. Using the ROC curve, an association was verified between the need for ITI and the dose of coagulation factor, with an accuracy of 67.7% that the use of higher doses of factor predisposes to the development of inhibitors. Conclusion: The study data allow us to infer that the earlier the prophylaxis treatment, the less joint impairment, the dose of the factor used and the less predisposition to develop coagulation factor inhibitors.
